Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 159

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : November | Volume : 17 | Issue : 11 | Page : WC01 - WC05 Full Version

Non venereal Female Genital Dermatoses: Beyond Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: November 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/65885.18660
Geo Celestin Danny, G Sukanya, Shreya Srinivasan, N Ashok Kumar, D Manoharan, Sowmya Nagaraju

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprosy (DVL), Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprosy (DVL), Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprosy (DVL), Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Professor, Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprosy (DVL), Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Professor, Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprosy (DVL), Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 6. Junior Resident, Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprosy (DVL), Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
G Sukanya,
7, CLC Works Road, Chrompet, Chennai, Tamil Nadu-600044, India.
E-mail: drsukanyamathupal@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Genital dermatoses can be categorised as either venereal or non venereal. Non venereal genital dermatoses have various causes, and their presentation may differ from that of cutaneous lesions due to local factors. Therefore, it is crucial to have a proper understanding in order to differentiate non sexually transmitted genital dermatoses from sexually transmitted ones.

Aim: To study the clinical patterns of non sexually transmitted genital dermatoses in females aged above 18 years.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Outpatient Department (OPD) of Dermatology at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Chennai, India, over a period of one year and six months. It involved 120 female patients above 18 years of age who were diagnosed with non venereal genital dermatosis. All patients were included in the study after providing informed consent. Patients with a history of significant anatomical alterations due to trauma or surgery were excluded. A detailed clinical history was obtained, followed by a thorough dermatological examination. After diagnosing non venereal genital dermatoses, classification based on aetiology and site of involvement was performed. The presence, distribution, and any associated conditions were also studied. Data was entered into a Microsoft Excel datasheet and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0. Categorical data was presented as frequencies and proportions.

Results: The mean age of the study participants was 43.08 years. The present study identified 21 different types of non venereal dermatoses, with infectious dermatosis being the most common in 60 (50%) cases, followed by inflammatory dermatosis 33 (27.5%) cases, miscellaneous conditions in 19 (15.83%) cases, benign and physiological conditions in 7 (5.83%) cases, and malignancies in 1 (0.83%) case. Vulvovaginal candidiasis was the most common dermatosis observed in the present study, accounting for 21 cases (17.5%) of the entire study population.

Conclusion: Genital diseases can cause significant psychological trauma and anxiety for patients. It is important to note that not all genital dermatoses are sexually transmitted. Non-venereal dermatoses affecting the external genitalia in females encompass a spectrum of diseases with diverse aetiologies. Therefore, accurate diagnosis of these non venereal dermatoses is crucial to alleviate the patient’s concerns regarding sexually transmitted diseases and the associated stigma.

Keywords

Female genitalia, Infections, Non sexually, Tumours

Non-venereal dermatoses of the female external genitalia are dermatoses that are not transmitted sexually. These include a wide range of conditions, ranging from infections and inflammatory dermatoses to benign and malignant conditions (1). The prevalence of vulvar dermatoses was reported as 2.12% in a study by Mundhe AD et al., However, the present study included sexually transmitted infections as well, and more large-scale studies are required to pinpoint the prevalence of non venereal female genital dermatosis (2). Many people fail to maintain cleanliness in this region of the body, and few women engage in aggressive cleaning practices. Local factors, such as moisture, heat, friction, and irritants, along with hormonal effects on the genitalia, may change the appearance of lesions involving the genital area. This can lead to a diagnostic dilemma for the treating physician, as the presentation may vary from that of classical cutaneous lesions (3).

Most genital dermatoses are associated with itching and pain, causing discomfort to the patient and affecting daily activities. Additionally, due to the site involved, genital dermatoses are frequently mistaken for sexually transmitted illnesses. Sometimes, the morphology of the lesions can cause sexual dysfunction, anxiety, and mental distress (4). Hence, the distinction between sexually and non sexually transmitted genital dermatoses is crucial.

The aim of the present research was to study the clinical pattern of non sexually transmitted genital dermatoses in females aged above 18 years.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study conducted at the Outpatient Department (OPD) of Dermatology at of Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital in Chennai over a period of one year and six months, from September 2021 to February 2023. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) with Ref. No. 002/SBMC/IHEC/2020/1405, and informed consent was obtained.

Inclusion criteria: Female patients above 18 years of age, diagnosed with non venereal genital dermatosis, were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with a history of major anatomical alteration following trauma or surgery were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

A total of 120 patients were recruited for the present study. Clinical history was taken, after which the patients underwent a thorough dermatological examination. After making the diagnosis of non venereal genital dermatoses, classification based on the aetiology and site of involvement was performed. The existence, distribution, and any associated conditions, if present, were studied. In select cases, based on history and clinical presentation, sexually transmitted infections were ruled out with appropriate blood tests, tissue/discharge smears, and histopathology.

Statistical Analysis

Data were entered into a Microsoft Excel datasheet and analysed using SPSS version 22.0 software. The categorical data were represented in the form of frequencies and proportions.

Results

A total of 120 patients with non venereal genital dermatoses were included in the present study. The patients’ ages ranged from 18 to 78 years, with a mean age of 43.08 years (SD: 13.79). Most of the patients belonged to the age group of 41 to 60 years, accounting for 50 (41.67%) cases, followed by the age group of 21 to 40 years with 49 (40.83%) cases (Table/Fig 1).

The majority of the patients were married 110 (91.67%), and most of them were housewives 91 (75.83%) by occupation. Other occupations included manual laborers 10 (8.33%), domestic workers 5 (4.17%), nurses 5 (4.17%), receptionists 1 (0.83%), shopkeepers 1 (0.83%), students 2 (1.67%), teachers 1 (0.83%), and technicians 4 (3.33%). In the present study, 21 different types of non venereal genital dermatoses was observed. Infectious dermatoses accounted for 60 (50%) cases, followed by inflammatory dermatoses with 33 (27.5%) cases, miscellaneous conditions with 19 (15.83%) cases, benign and physiological conditions with 7 (5.83%) cases, and malignancy with 1 (0.83%) case.

Among the various infectious dermatoses observed, vulvo-vaginal candidiasis accounted for 21 (35%) cases, while dermatophytosis accounted for 18 (30%) cases. The most common age group affected was 21 to 40 years (Table/Fig 2). The second most commonly observed dermatoses were inflammatory dermatoses, which consisted of five different types. Lichen planus was the most common, with 10 (30.3%) cases, followed by lichen sclerosis with 8 (24.24%) cases. The most common age group affected was 41 to 60 years (Table/Fig 3). Various dermatoses that fell under the miscellaneous group included vitiligo with 9 (47.37%) cases, immune bullous disorders with 4 (21.05%) cases, drug reactions with 4 (21.05%) cases, and contact dermatitis with 2 (10.53%) cases. The most common age group affected was 41 to 60 years (Table/Fig 4).

Benign and physiological conditions constituted 7 (5.83%) of the dermatoses. There were five different conditions: acrochordon 1 (14.29%), keratoacanthoma 1 (14.29%), bartholin’s cyst 1 (14.29%), vulval varicosities 2 (28.57%), and steatocystoma multiplex 2 (28.57%) (Table/Fig 5).

There was 1 (0.83%) case of squamous cell carcinoma, a malignant condition seen in an elderly female who presented with a rapidly progressing painful nodular lesion over the clitoris. The most common presenting complaints in the present study were itching with a burning sensation in 21 (17.5%) cases and itching with discharge in 17 (14.2%) cases, followed by itching alone in 11 (9.1%) cases. There were also 8 (6.7%) cases of pain and 5 (4.2%) cases of discharge alone, while 58 (48.3%) of the patients remained asymptomatic, as seen in (Table/Fig 6). Exclusive genital complaints were seen in 50 (41.67%) of the patients, whereas 70 (58.33%) of the patients presented with both genital and extragenital complaints (Table/Fig 7). Among these 70 (58.33%) patients, 51 (72.9%) had the same complaints over the genitalia and extragenital sites, while the remaining 19 (27.1%) had different complaints over extragenital sites than those of the genitalia.

The most common site involved in the genitalia was the labia majora in 76 (63.33%) cases, followed by vaginal mucosa in 30 (25%) cases, labia majora, as well as labia minora in 13 (10.8%) cases, and clitoris in 1 (0.83%) case (Table/Fig 8).

Systemic diseases were seen in 62 (51.6%) of the patients, with diabetes being the most common at 39 (62.9%), followed by hypertension at 17 (27.4%), hypothyroidism at 4 (6.4%), and polycystic ovarian syndrome at 2 (3.2%) (Table/Fig 9).

Diabetes mellitus (62.9%) was the most common associated systemic disease in our study, frequently observed among patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis. (Table/Fig 10) shows clinical images of the various dermatoses observed in the study.

Discussion

Age distribution: The present study included a total of 120 patients with non venereal genital dermatoses. The patients’ ages ranged from 18 to 78 years, with a mean age of 43.08 years. The majority of patients belonged to the age group of 41 to 60 years (41.67%), followed by the age group of 21 to 40 years (40.83%). Studies conducted by Puri N et al., and Prasad AM et al., also showed the most commonly affected age group to be 21-40 years, with mean ages of 32 years and 38.82 years, respectively (1),(5). Similarly, Sivayadevi P and Anandan H, found that patients’ ages ranged from 18 to 55 years, with the majority falling into the age group of 26 to 40 years (6). Singh G et al., reported a mean age of 34.9 years, with most patients belonging to the age group of 36 to 40 years (7). Singh N et al., observed that the majority of their patients were in the age group of 41-60 years (41.6%), followed by the age group of 31-40 years (17.5%) (8).

Marital status and occupation: In the present study, the majority of patients 110 (91.67%) married and most of them were housewives 91 (75.83%), followed by manual laborers 10 (8.33%). Gurumayum M et al., et al., also found that the majority of their patients were homemakers (9), while Singh N et al., reported that most patients were manual laborers (8).

Types of non venereal dermatoses: Present study showed 21 different types of non venereal genital dermatoses. The most common type was infectious dermatoses 60 (50%), followed by inflammatory dermatoses 33 (27.5%), miscellaneous conditions 19 (15.83%), benign and physiological conditions 7 (5.83%), and malignancy 1 (0.83%). Sivayadevi P, Anandan H, reported 23 types of non venereal dermatoses, with infections and infestations being the most common, accounting for 39% of cases. Vulvovaginal candidiasis was seen in 16% of the women and was the most common infective dermatosis (6). Prasad AM et al., identified 16 different types of dermatoses, with inflammatory dermatoses being the most common (5). Shinde G and Popere S, Singh N et al., found 19 types of dermatoses, with inflammatory dermatoses being the most common, followed by infective dermatoses (3),(8).

Infective dermatoses: In the present study, 21 women (35% of the cases of infectious dermatoses) were diagnosed with vulvovaginal candidiasis, followed by dermatophytosis with 18 cases (30%). Almost all patients with dermatophytosis had lesions on both extragenital sites (tinea corporis) and genital lesions (tinea cruris). These findings were similar to a study by Singh N et al., where candidiasis (9.1%) was the most common infective dermatosis, followed by dermatophytosis (5%) (8). Puri N and Puri A, showed 15% of cases with candidiasis and 10% with dermatophytosis (1). Prasad AM et al., found that candidiasis (46.4%) was the most common dermatosis, followed by folliculitis (28.5%) (5). In a study by Shinde G and Popere S, dermatophytosis (30%) was the most common, followed by candidiasis (12.5%) (7). Shinde G and Popere S, showed that dermatophytosis was the most common infective condition, followed by scabies (4%) and candidiasis (3%) (3).

Inflammatory dermatoses: The second most commonly observed dermatosis was inflammatory dermatoses, which encompassed five different dermatoses. In contrast to the present study, inflammatory dermatoses were the most common dermatoses in studies conducted by Shinde G and Popere S, Prasad AM et al., and Singh N et al., (3),(5),(8). Most of the patients with lichen planus (30.3%) had both genital and extragenital lesions, except for one patient who presented with only genital lesions. Singh G et al., observed that lichen planus (2.85%) was the second most common inflammatory dermatosis (7). Lichen sclerosus was the second most common inflammatory dermatosis in the present study, with 8 (24.24%) cases. However, in studies conducted by Puri N and Puri A, Singh G et al., and Singh N et al., lichen sclerosus was reported as the most common inflammatory dermatosis, constituting 15%, 10%, and 21.7% of cases, respectively (1),(7),(8). Lichen simplex chronicus accounted for 5 (15.15%) cases in the present study and was the third most common dermatosis. In studies conducted by Puri N and Puri A, Singh N et al., it was the second most common dermatosis (1),(8). A few patients presented with extensive psoriasis (9.09%), involving the genitalia on examination. Shinde G and Popere S, reported that psoriasis (17%) was the most common inflammatory dermatosis (3). Singh G et al., observed 2.85% of cases with psoriasis and reported it as the third most common dermatosis in their study (7).

Miscellaneous: Among 9 (47.37%) patients with vitiligo, the majority presented with vitiligo vulgaris, while 2 patients had only genital vitiligo (5). Prasad AM et al., observed vitiligo (15.4%) as the most common dermatosis (5). Puri N and Puri A, reported vitiligo in 15% of cases, making it one of the most common dermatoses (1). A study conducted by Singh N et al., showed that 15.8% of the participants had vitiligo (8). Among the 4 (21.05%) patients who presented with immunobullous disorders, three had pemphigus vulgaris, and one had bullous pemphigoid. Shinde G and Popere S, observed 7% of cases with pemphigus vulgaris (3). Drug reactions were observed in 4 (21.05%) patients, with two cases of erythema multiforme, one case of fixed drug eruption, and one case of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms.

Benign and physiological conditions: The present study recorded 7 (5.83%) cases of benign and physiological dermatoses. Singh G et al., in their study, observed 5.7% cases of benign tumours and cysts (7). Vulval varicosities (28.57%), a physiological condition, were seen in two pregnant females during their third trimester. They presented with asymptomatic dilated veins over the labia, which appeared as swelling. A total of 2 (28.57%) patients with steatocystoma multiplex presented with multiple cystic swellings over the genital region. Acrochordon constituted 1 (14.29%) of the benign dermatoses and was seen over the labia majora. The patient also had similar lesions on the nape of the neck and was a known case of diabetes. In a study conducted by Singh N et al., it was the second most common benign condition, with the first being an epidermal inclusion cyst (8).

Malignancy: Squamous cell carcinoma, a malignant condition, was seen in an elderly female 1 (0.83%), who presented with a rapidly progressing painful nodular lesion over the clitoris. In a study conducted by Singh N et al., 5% of the patients presented with invasive squamous cell carcinoma (8).

Site of involvement over genitalia: The most common site involved in the genitalia was the labia majora 76 (63.33%), followed by the vaginal mucosa 30 (25%). Similar findings were seen in studies conducted by Puri N and Puri A, and Vinay N et al., (1),(10). In a study conducted by Singh N et al., it was found that 91.7% of the participants had lesions over the labia majora, followed by the labia minora (48.3%) (8).

Association with systemic disease: Diabetes mellitus 39 (62.9%) was the most common associated systemic disease in the present study, where most of the patients were known cases of diabetes, and a few were newly diagnosed. It was most commonly seen among patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis. Puri N and Puri A, showed similar findings in their study, where diabetes was most commonly associated with vulvovaginal candidiasis (1). In a study conducted by Sivayadevi P, Anandan H, all patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis had type 2 diabetes mellitus (6).

Limitation(s)

The sample size was relatively low, especially since large-scale studies on non venereal dermatoses of the female genitalia are lacking. Additionally, a dermatology life-quality index could have been conducted to assess the impact of these dermatoses on the quality of life.

Conclusion

Genital diseases may be associated with severe psychological trauma and fear in the minds of patients. Non venereal dermatoses of the female external genitalia include a spectrum of diseases with varied aetiology. Dermatologists, should be aware of the different presentations of dermatoses of the female genitalia since not all genital dermatoses are sexually transmitted. It is important to diagnose and differentiate these non venereal dermatoses to relieve patients from the stigma of sexually transmitted diseases.

References

1.
Puri N, Puri A. A study on non venereal genital dermatoses in north India. Our Dermatology Online/Nasza Dermatologia Online. 2012;3(4):304-07. [crossref]
2.
Mundhe AD, Jadhav A, Deo K, Deora MS, Gaikwad R, Shinde RC. Prevalence and risk factors of vulvar dermatoses: A hospital-based study. Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS. 2022;43(1):30-34. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Shinde G, Popere S. A clinical study of non venereal genital dermatoses of adult in a tertiary care center. International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research. 2017;8(04):168-73.
4.
Vellaisamy SG, Muthukumarasamy V, Gopalan K. A study of pattern and assessment of life quality index in patients of nonvenereal dermatoses of external genitalia at a tertiary care center. Indian J Sex Transm Dis. 2023;44(1):49-55. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Prasad AM, Babu AR, Shivakumar V. A clinical study of non venereal genital dermatoses in women in a rural setup. Int J Med Public Health. 2020;10(1):29-33.
6.
Sivayadevi P, Anandan H. A study of pattern of non venereal genital dermatoses in female patients at a tertiary care center. Int J Res Dermatol. 2019;5(1):134-38. [crossref]
7.
Singh G, Rathore BS, Bhardwaj A, Sharma S. Non venereal benign dermatoses of vulva in sexually active women: A clinical study. Int J Res Dermatol. 2016;2(2):25-29.[crossref]
8.
Singh N, Thappa DM, Jaisankar TJ, Habeebullah S. Pattern of non-venereal dermatoses of female external genitalia in South India. Dermatol Online J. 2008;14(1):1. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Gurumayum M, Shivakumar V, Okade R. Non-venereal female genital dermatoses: A clinical study. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2014;2:2864-73.
10.
Vinay N, Ranugha PSS, Betkerur JB, Shastry V, Ashwini PK. Non-venereal genital dermatoses and their impact on quality of life-A cross-sectional study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2022;88(3):354-59.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/65885.18660

Date of Submission: Jun 07, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Aug 15, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Aug 30, 2023
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 08, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 14, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Aug 26, 2023 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com